Relevant Publications

Risk Assessment’s Docs Relevant Publications

You are currently viewing a revision titled "Relevant Publications", saved on March 26, 2013 at 3:29 pm by admin
Title
Relevant Publications
Content
Below is a list of publications that are relevant to this Community, sorted by objective. This list will be manually updated on a regular basis. It was last updated at 6:00 pm EST on March 26, 2013. 1. Coordinate with the Ontologies & Databases CoR on terminology and resources and enable inputs from the Ecotoxicology Testing & Predictive Models CoR, the Predictive Modeling for Human Health CoR,       and the Exposure through the Life Cycle CoR to be meaningfully analyzed by methods from the Risk Assessment CoR in a manner that supports informed decision-making by the Risk Management & Control CoR. 2. Inventory methods and tools available for assessing and comparing potential risks and changes in risk for engineered nanomaterials and nano-enabled products (including applications such as medical diagnostics and treatment).
  • 'Environmental risk analysis for nanomaterials: Review and evaluation of frameworks,' Nanotoxicology, 6(2), 196–212 (2012)
  • 'Analysis of current research addressing complementary use of life-cycle assessment and risk assessment for engineered nanomaterials: have lessons been learned from previous experience with chemicals?,' J. Nanopart. Res., 14, 958-981 (2012)
  • 'Operationalization and application of “early warning signs” to screen nanomaterials for harmful properties,' Environ. Sci.: Processes Impacts, 15, 190-203 (2013)
  • Danish Ministry of the Environment, Environmental Protection Agency, NanoRiskCat - A Conceptual Decision Support Tool for Nanomaterials
  • 'For nanotechnology decisions, use decision analysis,' Nano Today8, 5-10 (2013)
3. Match tools with end-user mission and decision needs, including the use of appropriate risk definitions, life cycle , and risk and benefit assessment and management tools of appropriate computational complexity.
  • 'Improving Risk Governance of Emerging Technologies through Public Engagement: The Neglected Case of Nano-Remediation?,' Int. J. Emerg. Tech. and and Society,  10, 61-78 (2012)
  • 'For nanotechnology decisions, use decision analysis,' Nano Today8, 5-10 (2013)
4. Identify gaps among tools, data, stakeholder missions, and management need.
  • 'A decision-directed approach for prioritizing research into the impact of nanomaterials on the environment and human health,' Nature Nanotechnology, 6, 784–787 (2011)
  • 'Operationalization and application of “early warning signs” to screen nanomaterials for harmful properties,' Environ. Sci.: Processes Impacts, 15, 190-203 (2013)
  • 'Analysis of current research addressing complementary use of life-cycle assessment and risk assessment for engineered nanomaterials: have lessons been learned from previous experience with chemicals?,' J. Nanopart. Res., 14, 958-981 (2012)
  • 'Environmental risk analysis for nanomaterials: Review and evaluation of frameworks,' Nanotoxicology, 6(2), 196–212 (2012)
  • 'Redefining Risk Research Priorities for Nanomaterials,'  J. Nanopart. Res., 12, 383-392 (2010)
  • 'Environmental benefits and risks of zero-valent iron nanoparticles (nZVI) for in situ remediation: risk mitigation or trade-off?,' J. Contaminant Hydrology, 118, 165–183 (2010)
  • 'Nanoparticles: Uncertainty Risk Analysis,' Encyclopedia of Environmental Management, CRC Press, 1720-1729 (2012)
  • 'The known unknowns of nanomaterials: Describing and characterizing uncertainty within environmental, health and safety risks,' Nanotoxicology, 1, 1-12 (2009)
5. Review data to assess underlying physicochemical parameters and environmental conditions that can be used as predictors of nanoparticle risks.
6. Compare risks associated with engineered nanoparticles with those presented by materials from traditional manufacturing methods and with incidental and naturally occurring nanomaterials and evaluate associated uncertainty. 7. Recommend a framework for including considerations of health and environmental impacts in planning and decision-making for the production, use, and disposal/recycling of nanomaterials and nano-enabled products.
  • 'Environmental risk analysis for nanomaterials: Review and evaluation of frameworks,' Nanotoxicology, 6(2), 196–212 (2012)
  • 'For nanotechnology decisions, use decision analysis,' Nano Today, 8, 5-10 (2013)
8. Recommend methods for calculating risks that allow for the ability to assess associated uncertainty as well as adapt and update risk estimates as new information becomes available or as stakeholder mission and decision needs change.
  • 'Environmental risk analysis for nanomaterials: Review and evaluation of frameworks,' Nanotoxicology, 6(2), 196–212 (2012)
  • 'The known unknowns of nanomaterials: Describing and characterizing uncertainty within environmental, health and safety risks,' Nanotoxicology1, 1-12 (2009)
9. Identify steps forward required to produce comparable risk calculations within a defined context or mission.
Excerpt
Footnotes


Old New Date Created Author Actions
February 10, 2014 at 11:33 am Stacey Standridge
February 10, 2014 at 11:24 am admin
April 19, 2013 at 12:38 pm Stacey Standridge
March 26, 2013 at 7:47 pm admin
March 26, 2013 at 7:43 pm admin
March 26, 2013 at 7:42 pm admin
March 26, 2013 at 7:40 pm admin
March 26, 2013 at 7:39 pm admin
March 26, 2013 at 7:38 pm admin
March 26, 2013 at 7:33 pm admin
March 26, 2013 at 7:32 pm admin
March 26, 2013 at 7:30 pm admin
March 26, 2013 at 7:29 pm admin
March 26, 2013 at 7:28 pm admin
March 26, 2013 at 6:43 pm admin
March 26, 2013 at 5:58 pm admin